![]() foreign policy to other agencies and over foreign policy formulation to the National Security Council at the White House. Despite rounds of internally and externally-driven reform, State has steadily ceded authority over implementation of U.S. (My own contribution to the literature described State as “ neither agile, efficient, strategic, nor particularly relevant.”)Ĭoncerns about the Department’s competence and influence are perennial. Think tanks from across the political spectrum have chronicled State’s weaknesses (e.g., “ a profound state of disrepair,” “ fading influence,” “ widely acknowledged shortcomings”) and made sincere, often insightful, recommendations. ![]() To google “Reforming the State Department” is to get lost in a thicket of critical opinion pieces.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |